Friday, May 2, 2014

Why is it still difficult for teachers to integrate technology in the classroom?

Teachers and Technology Integration  


Photography. Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. Web. 2 May 2014.

   Technology – we can’t escape this word or the immediacy by which schools choose to incorporate its use of educational internet programs more effectively and efficiently in classrooms. Many teachers have spent numerous hours searching for educational programs which complement and complete the learning objectives and outcomes in unit planning. Many develop lesson plans which successfully integrate technology in their respective educational settings. On the other hand, there are many established teachers who find this to be extremely difficult, when time is limited, to learn new technologies and cannot seem to find a way to share this knowledge with students. Ironically, the students themselves have become the experts in technology use where many teachers have become the pupils fumbling through seemingly simple usage tasks. As money for technology training can be somewhat difficult to obtain, what is the solution for successfully helping teachers to learn how to integrate technology more successfully?  As educators, we must learn to patient and come to realize that planning and utilizing meaningful technology use in the classroom initially will take a considerable amount of time, practice, and patience. In addition, as educators and students become more familiar with the technology tool or media product, lesson delivery and time concerns will be lessened as trial and error will identified and learning outcomes will eventually be realized and completed.

 Photography. Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. Web. 2 May 2014.

"Digital Immigrants" versus "Digital Natives"

     The National Middle School Association Conference in 2008 focused on incorporation of technology “sandboxes” where teachers could see different technologies in action allowed teachers to explore these technologies further and “play”.  The time spent discovering programs such as SchoolTube, ePals, Wikispaces, and Promethean Activboard use was invaluable to many.  Teachers who were allowed to explore the sandbox left the conference with many great ideas for technology integration in their respective classrooms. Alan November, the keynote speaker at the opening general session, describes teachers and administrators as “digital immigrants”, while students are the “digital natives”. He also suggested that teachers should embrace this change in the “power structure” where the student in the classroom has become the expert. The Guardian Online News Site explores this further under a blog entitled "Technology in education: If students aren't worried, why are the teachers?" Should teachers take the time to experience this phenomenon? Is it really that difficult to take lessons from our students? Many would argue that true educators should be the experts or leaders in the classroom, but, in a learning environment, should we not turn to the experts when we are floundering and need some assistance? Some teachers have a difficult time admitting when they do not understand or know something as they are supposed to be that “expert”. Why not allow the roles to be reversed in order to better learn from one another?  

 Reference:  Rios, Roland,  "Students Teaching Teachers Technology" - 

Role reversal in education

     Many of the most difficult media products have been presented by students as effective tools to promote learning in and outside of the classroom setting (MineCraft, PowToon, Animoto). The best learning opportunities occur when students are placed in the teaching role.  The “use it” or “lose it” rule readily applies to technology, and many teachers, including myself, need to be reminded of features in programs especially when we have not used this tool in a while. I often seek student expert assistance when I forget or need a refresher course on using settings on Wikispaces, when changing page and title layouts on Weebly or more recently trying to gain microphone access on VoiceThread. Students, in turn, do not present themselves as superior, but rather as cooperative participants in solving a problem in the learning process. There is no shame in asking for help, and today, students are eager to assist simply when asked. The best thing that comes from this role reversal is that many of these students will be more willing to come for help with other questions as I am viewed as a learner too who will try to help them as they have helped me. After all, when I lose all my data from my iPhone, should I complain about my own stupidity or ask a 12 year old for help in order to retrieve the data? I choose to ask the most quiet student in my class that is a MineCraft aficionado as they probably will know how to fix my problem with the ancient 3GS iPhone. Interestingly, these same students are also able to explain things to me in a very simple and tolerant manner which teaches me patience and makes me reflect on my own interactions with student and take note.

Photography. Encyclopædia Britannica ImageQuest. Web. 2 May 2014. 

Planning and integrating technology 

     It is important to begin planning units starting with the development of clear desired results (outcomes) and then spend time examining how to develop assessment evidence which incorporated media products. Once this has been established, we should next develop the steps which outline the learning plan. As we learn how to more effectively integrate technology and meaningful media products in our units, we also have to realize that it will take time to learn how to use and execute desired outcomes on the first go around. Here, we need to determine what we want the students to know and understand, and what created evidence will show student learning. Students will help with technology delivery, but what will we all learn from the process? This is, of course, the intended goal of integrating technology in a meaningful way, but as educators, we should be willing to try regardless of our apprehension and fear in order to hopefully succeed. Many educators will state that the time that it takes to effectively incorporate media products takes away from other necessary curriculum. This may or may not be the case, but as with any teaching tool, the initial introduction to a new topic or unit always takes time. The risk of modifying other units to reach a desired goal is truly up to the professional to decide. I have experienced several failures in integrating technology in a meaningful and successful manner without achieving specific outcomes, but continue to learn from my "mistakes" as it were in order to try again. It is important to reflect and then choose to use different and more effective tools with students by collaborating with others (Edudemic.com) in order to insure learning success for all. The time is worth it when students can reflect on their learning and use these skills to develop knowledge and understanding further.


References:
Brown, C.A., Delialioglu, O., & Oncu, S. (2008, January). Critical components for
           technology integration: How do instructors make decisions?  Journal of
           Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, v.27, no.1, pp 19-46.

"Technology in Education: If Students Aren't Worried, Why Are Teachers?" Theguardian.com. Guardian News and Media, 10 Mar. 2014. Web. 02 May 2014.

The National Middle School Conference(2008).  Convention Booklet.






Thursday, May 1, 2014

How can we use technology in our classroom and why?


Top 10 Reasons to Use Technology in Education: iPad, Tablet,…


As technology advances, it can be though to adapt to the development in our lives, in both actually, personal and professional. Being a teacher we have an important role related to the use and implementation of technology in the classroom, it can be learning tools for students or teaching tools for the teacher.

Children adapt themselves better with the advancements of technology than adults, for this reason including technology in teaching is a great way to encourage and motivate students’ interest in learning. In addition to learning the contents all involved learned to use other tools to improve communication (social media - http://www.edudemic.com/beyond-blocking-social-media-schools/)

 

What can we use?

 

There a number of private schools substitute the chalk and white boards in the classrooms for interactive Smart Boards from K-12. As a new user of technology I had to research about tools to use with my students in the classroom, below I put a list with some suggestions:


Social Learning

These tools use the power of social media to help students learn and teachers connect.










 
Learning

These educational tools can help you to make lessons fun, interesting, and more effective.

Khan Academy









 Lesson Planning and Tools

Use these tech tools to pull together great lessons and design amazing and memorable student projects.
 















 Useful Tools

These tools can help you to stay connected, organized, and increase the ease of building multimedia lessons and learning tools.



Google Education













What is necessary to incorporate technology in the classroom?


In the 21st Century it should be mandatory that all schools have computers, iPads, Smart Boards, among others devices in the classrooms to follow the advance of the technology. In my opinion the first think that should be done is engage the community and clarify that technology plays an important role in our lives; second thing is create a funding/budget to use in technology and third thing is invest in teacher’s professional development.

When I began teaching I did not have a broad knowledge of all the tools that I could use in the classroom (I still do not have), however I did some courses to improve this. I think that schools should always invest on it.

 

Are the teachers prepared/ready to use technology in the classroom?

 

“Teacher will not be replaced by technology, but teachers who don’t use technology will be replaced by those who do.” Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach

 

I agree that some teachers will be replaced for another ones, especially for younger teachers who have more knowledge and abilities to use and manage this new tools.

 
I believe that most of the teachers have a readiness about technology; however it is necessary more training to them to learn and integrate this technology into their classrooms:

 
What All Teachers Need

To integrate technology into

their classrooms, teachers must

feel comfortable with technology.

Principals who wish to

enhance their teachers’ readiness

can provide ongoing training,

opportunities for teachers to

collaborate, and access to technology

support, and modeling.


Final comments

 

The use of technology in the classroom is inevitable and necessary, so we (teachers) have to be prepared for new. Schools must prepare their teachers for the best use of all technologies that are provided for them. Besides we are doing this for our students that are anger for new!

 
  
Sources:








https://www.principals.org/portals/0/content/48158.pdf

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

What requirements should be mandatory for a school to implement a BYOD program?



Two quotes often pop up in my mind when I am making a decision:


1. If we wait until we’re ready we’ll be waiting the rest of our lives.  - Lemony Snicket
2. If you fail to plan, then you plan to fail. - Ben Franklin

Funny though, it wasn’t until reflecting on BYOD implementation requirements that I discovered how opposite my two go-to quotes are, and how well they both describe schools implementing a BYOD program.


I agree schools need to kick start the program before they are totally ready, this gives the school time to engage the community and get the technology excitement and anticipation building. 


Source: ImgFave. www.imgfave.com/

However, I do not believe full implementation should happen until a specific set of requirements are met. Currently, BYOD is simply an acronym for Bring Your Own Device, that is it. Once a school has made the decision to begin BYOD, there is no set plan in place to do so using the best practices. Enter my second quote, “If you fail to plan, then you plan to fail.”  The BYOD program is ready for the next level. Solid programs need to be established, norms need to be set, and trainings must be provided for an entire school to benefit from implementing a BYOD Program. Simply put, a better plan needs to be made and followed regarding the implementation of a BYOD program.


Helpful guides of requirements and implementation checklists have been published by many sources.  “K-12 Blueprint, a planning resource for personalized learning” has published a BYOD Planning and Implementation Framework document and a Readiness Checklist for School Districts.1  Both of these lists are a great way for a school to prove ready to begin the BYOD program.


1: Acceptable Use Policy
2: Network Protection
3: Secure Network Access
4: Network Capability
5: Mobile Device Limitations
6: Usability
7: Curriculum
8: Professional Development
9: Logistics
10: Communication
11: Budget
Step 1: Engage the Community
Step 2: Develop a Team
Step 3: Develop the Physical Infrastructure
Step 4: Develop the Software Infrastructure
Step 5: Develop a Portal
Step 6: Develop an Acceptable Use Policy
Step 7: Build a Curriculum
Step 8: Consider Devices
Step 9: Provide Ongoing Professional Development


For further details and information on these lists, see original source:
“K-12 Blueprint” BYOD Toolkit: BYOD Planning and Implementation Framework. http://www.k12blueprint.com/sites/default/files/BYOD-Planning-Implementation-Framework.pdf


“K-12 Blueprint” BYOD Toolkit: Readiness checklist for School Districts.




Source: Colour My Learning, BYOD in Schools - Considerations. www.colourmylearning.com



These above lists provide a great framework for schools looking in to beginning a BYOD program.  As with any new initiative or program, a few things always failed to be planned. A few specifics from my personal experiences that are very important for any school to consider are the following:

  • Electrical Outlets - available, abundant, and functioning electrical outlets.
  • Student computer access to school wireless printers
  • Require students to have a specific antivirus/anti-malware program and teach the students how to run and update this program.
  • Firewall particular sites that take up excessive school bandwidth.
  • Rigorous and ongoing professional development for staff and teachers.
Source: The Project Clear Clutter. projectclearclutter.blogspot.com


Professional development for teachers and staff before implementing a BYOD program is a must. As Peter DeWitt states, “Many teachers want to allow students to bring their own devices but they do not always understand how they handle the concept.”2


In addition, the article “5 Guidelines for Switching From Backpacks to BYOD”  focuses on the necessity of teacher training before implementation.3  With the proper differentiated professional development, all teachers will benefit from the sessions and will be more prepared to teach and guide the students through integrating technology and their curriculum.
Jane Miller, educational technology coordinator at Spokane Public Schools, stated the following about BYOD professional development:

“Spokane provided training for teachers on instructional strategies using devices. They also felt it was important to provide staff with scaffolds they could modify. Scaffolds included materials for district parent night, student agreements and classroom materials. It’s crucial for teachers to take ownership of the implementation, but scaffolds give teachers a starting point for creating classroom policies instead of having to create their own.”3




For a school to implement a technology infused curriculum, the following set of three requirements should be mandatory. These pre-implementation requirements can be verified by either a central BYOD agency or through a mentor BYOD sister school program. A central agency would model more the MYP model, while mentor schools would need an established BYOD program before being able to assist others in implementation.
The time it takes a school to meet these requirements will also allow for families to be aware of the upcoming program and plan financially for the purchase of the device. Again, this is for schools which plan to use the BYOD program as a means to infuse technology and curriculum, not just use the students’ devices as a tool in class.



Before requiring student to bring their device (with set specific specs) to class, the school must prove that:

1. The physical infrastructure has been improved. This includes: additional outlets, increased bandwidth, and wireless printing enabled.

2. Common programs have been established and will be taught to all students. This includes all software the students will need, an antivirus/antimalware program for all student's devices, as well as the education of how to run and update these programs.

3. Ongoing, differentiated professional development is provided to all teachers. This training should include a focus on pedagogy through technology, apps, cloud storage, and web tools and programs to infuse with the content curriculum.




If every school would take considerable time and effort  in satisfying these three requirements before implementing a BYOD program, students, teachers, parents, and school districts would all benefit greatly. All in all, start early to engage the community and then then follow a plan to ensure success in implementing a BYOD program.




Sources:
1) "Bring Your Own Device Toolkit." K-12 Blueprint. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Apr. 2014.
2) Stavert, Bruce. "BYOD in Schools Literature Review." (2013): n. pag. Web. 29 Apr. 2014. <http://byodsandpit.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/3/0/11303946/litrev_2013_final_2.pdf>.
3) Tomczyk, Sarah. "5 Guidelines for Switching from Backpacks to BYOD."Blackboard Blog. N.p., 31 Oct. 2013. Web. 29 Apr. 2014.


Morrison, Nick. "The Next Revolution In School Tech: Bring Your Own Device."Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 19 Jan. 2014. Web. 29 Apr. 2014.
"The MYP Journey - Overview of the Authorization Process." MYP Info Updates. N.p., 08 Oct. 2013. Web. 29 Apr. 2014.