Saturday, April 26, 2014

Let's ALL Join the Librarian

 


Using Diigo in the Library and for Classroom Projects

"Gone are the days where you dial in your librarian" for getting links.  So an instructor said earlier this week, and as a school librarian who has spent hours building resource lists, it would be great if Diigo and sites like it would lead collaboratively to the strong, reliable resources in LESS TIME for the students.  (Experience says that if you want to convince a student to go beyond Google, you must prove the alternative to be both better and quicker.)  I agree that dialing in teachers, librarians, tech coordinators, and students can vastly expand the number of resources available.  I believe that people should think about at least two things as they embrace the great resource that Diigo can become:

1) Source evaluation.  Used well, Diigo offers the opportunity for in-depth and continued feedback for users.  Unfortunately, that's like saying that Google offers amazing resources.  Of course Google offers great resources, but if you always go to the links to Yahoo Answers and Wikipedia, or never go beyond the first page of responses (or don't know how to craft a solid search to make sure that there are great responses on the first page), then it becomes a problem.  A link might be posted without thought as to its veracity, and a dozen people might comment on the problem without a person paying attention to the comments.

2) Independent work - Diigo offers community feedback, taking advantage of the work of others to inspire and expand your own research.  Diigo can also be used by students who don't want to do the research themselves to take advantage of the provided links and highlighted text and go no further.

When working with younger students with less experience in source evaluation, the first point is important because one wants to make sure that there is good guidance towards high quality sources.  In working with older students with more experience, the second point is important because there is a goal to wean these students off over-dependence on others and help them learn to trust their skills and abilities.

So how can the librarian best take advantage of Diigo?  Consider using Diigo for a group of instructors to build the resource list and make this viewable by younger students, but not a collaborative project with the students.  Consider taking some of the time saved because students will be getting added feedback and support during the research process, and put that time towards additional work on source evaluation.  With older students, have the community build entirely through student input, with the instructors only adding comments, not original links.  Finally, with all students, remember that if the question can be answered simply through Google, Wikipedia, or the Diigo, then we probably aren't asking the right questions in the first place.  

As a modern school librarian, I come to the same conclusion I have come to many times over the past few years.  Namely, Great tools like Diigo keep my job constantly changing on the surface, but they do not replace me and my fellow educators.  

What do you think are some important things to keep in mind as we create lesson plans for using Diigo?

PS. I'm also psyched about using Diigo for my non class-specific projects, like National Novel Writing Month.  What a great tool for sharing resources!  And unlike twitter, it doesn't come and go like a flash in the pan!  (The tweet comes and goes, not Twitter the resource itself.)

Image Citation: 
Branson, B. (1987). Librarian Accessing PDQ. National Cancer Institute. Retrieved May 15, 2014 from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Librarian_accessing_pdq.jpg.

6 comments:

  1. I think it is important that we keep in mind that Diigo is a tool for "knowledge management". Although Diigo allows to share and collaborate with others, it cannot replace the importance of learning through verbal communication with others.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find it interesting to compare Google and Diigo. I think of Google as the main means to search for information and Diigo as the program to organize, highlight, annotate, and share all of these findings. Therefore, I do not see Diigo as going beyond Google, instead it is a tool to use side by side with Google.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Love this post Cara. You have described the plight of teachers and librarians alike as we have to innovate to continue to make ourselves relevant. I'm glad to hear that you are hoping to give Diigo a try with your students and teachers. Just think about how much better an inquiry project could be with so many more eyes posting only a few of the very best links they find?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How do we make sure that only the best links are posted versus people just posting everything?

      Delete
  4. I would also like to comment on Monique and Lexi's thoughts. As brick-and-mortar educator taking this course, I hope you can begin to see where the strengths and limitations of these tools lie. As a tool to replace classroom conversation, its probably not ideal, but as a tools to stimulate classroom conversation, collect important quotes and ideas from texts in a way visible and accessible to everyone, it really is unbeatable. I'm still trying to figure out how that might be done without a computer let alone Diigo. Also, as to your question Lexi, I'm not sure that comparing Google to Diigo is apt, but I also don't think that was Cara's thrust. That said, I do often use Diigo to search for info when I know it will likely give me more education-related hits than Google.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love language and find it interesting. Having worked as an international educator for the last 4 years, I've learned so much about how easy it is read something in an entirely new light! I wasn't even thinking that my post could be read as comparing Diigo to Google. I was thinking about Diigo as being a useful resource that went beyond Google or pre-made lists of suggested sites for research, but that no matter what I have offered students in the past, if it's not Google or Wikipedia, the majority don't want to hear how much better/faster/more authoritative, etc. a tool is.

      Delete